The broken windows theory is a criminological concept formulated in 1982 by American sociologists James Wilson and George Kelling. The main idea is that tolerance of minor offenses provokes an increase in more serious crimes.
Key Principle
The name is illustrated by a metaphor: if a window in a building is broken and is left unrepaired, soon all the windows in that building will be broken. The mechanism is as follows:
In the context of HSE, this means that even minor deviations from safety rules can trigger a chain reaction, increasing the risk of occupational injuries and accidents.
Examples of Manifestations in the Workplace
|
Minor Non-Conformity |
Potential Violation |
|
When working with bench tools, an employee did not use a face shield |
May fail to use a gas mask in a gas-hazardous environment |
|
When drilling a wall, an employee used a power tool missing an inspection tag |
May use a power tool with visible insulation damage |
|
A single-line diagram is missing (or inaccessible) directly at the electrical installation. |
Safety signs such as "Do Not Turn On, Men at Work" will not be posted during operations |
Applying the Theory in Practice
Zero tolerance for violations: even minor violations must be stopped. This creates a safety culture and reduces the risk of major accidents.
Control and monitoring: regular workplace inspections, recording violations, addressing them, identifying root causes, and eliminating root causes.
Training and awareness: employees must understand that even minor violations can lead to serious consequences. Briefings, training sessions, and visual materials (posters, videos) help reinforce knowledge and foster a responsible attitude towards safety.
Leadership: organization executives and department heads must follow the rules themselves and demonstrate safe behavior. Their actions set the tone for the entire organization.
Advantages of the Approach
Disadvantages of the Approach
The broken windows theory emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive approach to HSE, where every violation is viewed as a potential risk. Its application requires consistency and the involvement of all levels of the organization, but it can significantly improve workplace safety.
Comments 1
A good useful article.