Transforming the safety culture in production is impossible without a qualitative change in approaches to technical training. Traditional lecture formats, overloaded with theory and disconnected from real tasks, show low efficiency when working with adult professionals. During the webinar, Vitaly Kirilin, Head of Technical Training Methodology, examines the fundamental principles of building educational programs using the example of the SiburIntech corporate center.
The speaker emphasizes a key physiological feature of adult learning: to form a new neural connection, the old one must first be destroyed. Unlike children, an adult does not perceive information without personal problematization. That is why training should start not with regulatory requirements, but with creating conditions under which the employee realizes the critical lack of knowledge for the safe performance of their work.
To overcome cognitive resistance, a rigid structure of a one-and-a-half-hour training module is proposed. Each block solves a specific task and does not allow for unnecessary fluff:
One of the most effective approaches discussed in detail in the presentation is the seamless integration of HSE modules into purely technical programs. For example, when studying the repair of pumping equipment, mechanics mandatorily complete a block on the LOTO protective lockout system. Safety ceases to be a separate, disconnected discipline and becomes an integral part of the production process.
The speaker pays special attention to the use of so-called "trash content" — videos of real accidents. Practice shows that this tool only works when the rule of "two or three handshakes" is observed. If the incident occurred within the company's perimeter and the trainees can identify with the victims, it causes a powerful response. Otherwise, psychological defense mechanisms kick in ("this won't happen to me"), and the content loses its educational value.
Training should not exist in a vacuum. A weekly analysis of incident investigation reports (RCA) is built into the methodology. This allows for the prompt identification of systemic gaps in personnel knowledge — for example, mass errors in the operation of uninterruptible power supplies — and targeted adjustments to training programs to prevent repeat incidents.
The final challenge remains transferring the formed skills from the comfortable conditions of the training center to the harsh realities of production (frost, workwear, limited visibility). Three tools are used to solve this problem: