In modern industry, one of the key problems in safety management is the disruption of bottom-up communication regarding critical risks. The speaker analyzes the results of a large-scale international study covering industrial company executives worldwide. The data reveals an alarming picture: in the vast majority of cases, top management does not receive objective information about the actual condition of equipment and pre-accident situations on site.
The presentation details the reasons for this phenomenon. The main factor, according to the managers themselves, is the pressure of ambitious financial and production plans handed down by shareholders. Prioritizing short-term profits over long-term investments in safety creates an environment where discussing costly problems becomes undesirable. Top management often does not want to hear about risks, as solving them requires enormous costs and can negatively impact performance metrics and bonuses.
On the part of line personnel and middle managers, the main barrier is fear. Employees are afraid that reporting a problem will lead to punishment, accusations of incompetence, or disloyalty. Furthermore, there is a persistent belief that even if a problem is reported, resources to solve it will not be allocated, and the responsibility for the consequences will fall on the person who raised the issue.
Using real cases, the speaker shows how years of underinvestment in fixed assets put local managers in a hopeless situation. They are forced to operate worn-out equipment without the ability to influence the situation, and over time they simply stop reporting risks, realizing the futility of these attempts.
To solve this problem, the implementation of a direct communication model for critical risks is proposed. The essence of the approach is as follows: