Training production staff is one of the most challenging tasks in HSE. For a long time, the system was built around knowledge testing rather than the learning process itself, which inevitably led to formalism. Employees memorized the right answers for tests and signed logs, but in practice, they continued to perform unsafe actions. Incompetence and a lack of real skills remain the main causes of workplace injuries.
In her presentation, Svetlana Vladimirova, Head of HSE Training at the Krastsvetmet corporate university, shares practical experience in transforming the worker training system. The speaker demonstrates how the company transitioned from standard briefings to creating a full-fledged Practical Skills Development Center, anticipating the requirements of new regulations.
The first step toward change was abandoning fragmented approaches to conducting briefings. The company noticed that the process varied across departments: in some places, managers truly engaged employees, while in others, they limited themselves to a formal review of instructions. To solve this problem, a unified interactive format was developed.
Specialists created about 50 video briefings covering core and combined professions, types of work, and the use of PPE. Now, the manager does not just read a text but shows video material and conducts an engaging conversation by asking open-ended questions. This made it possible to standardize the quality of information delivery across all areas.
The next stage was the creation of a 16-module program called "Safety School for Workers." Unlike courses for managers and specialists, the emphasis here was on safe work methods, first aid, and emergency response. Even then, the company began implementing practical skills training, which became a solid foundation for further development.
With the entry into force of Decree No. 2464, which shifted the focus from knowledge testing to practical training, many companies faced a choice: send employees to third-party training centers or organize the process internally. The speaker analyzes the economic and qualitative aspects of this decision in detail.
Calculations show that training over a thousand employees in four main programs (including fire safety) at a third-party center would cost several million rubles. At the same time, the quality of training often remains questionable: programs do not account for the specifics of a particular production facility, and practical exercises are replaced by formal testing.
Creating an in-house Practical Skills Development Center requires initial investments in equipment (first aid mannequins, fire extinguishing stations, PPE stock), but it proves to be significantly more effective in the long run. Internal training allows for complete quality control, adaptation of programs to real production risks, and prompt implementation of changes based on feedback.
Organizing practical training does not always require colossal budgets. The presentation shows how to use existing resources and partnerships. For example, the theoretical part can be moved online using a corporate portal and video content.
An interesting life hack shared by the speaker is involving contracting companies. For instance, a workwear supplier under an outsourcing agreement can provide free training on the proper use of PPE. Internal experts, such as HSE specialists and gas rescue service employees, are brought in to conduct practical sessions.
The main social effect of creating the Center is a change in workers' attitudes toward their own safety. Training in a workshop format with emotional engagement helps form stable neural connections: from recognizing danger to understanding the consequences and ways to avoid them.