The HSE industry has long relied on minor injury rates (LTIFR) as the primary safety indicator. However, historical examples, such as the Deepwater Horizon platform accident, show that the absence of minor injuries does not guarantee protection against catastrophic events. In his presentation, man-made risk assessment expert Sergey Ryabov explains why the traditional approach needs revision and how the critical risk management methodology helps prevent mass casualties and asset loss.
Any company's resources — time, budget, personnel — are always finite. It is impossible to control absolutely all risks simultaneously and with equal efficiency. The speaker emphasizes the need for strict prioritization: the focus should shift to significant negative events. These are situations that, if inadequately controlled, can lead to fatalities, massive environmental damage, or production shutdowns.
Instead of scattering attention on eliminating all minor flaws in a row, the critical risk management system proposes first building reliable protection against fatal threats using a system of barriers.
Barriers are control elements that stand between the hazard source and a person or asset. The presentation details the division of barriers into two categories:
One of the main problems with traditional briefings is that workers often do not absorb the information. To translate theory into practice, the speaker demonstrates the implementation of a personal checklist system using a mining enterprise as an example.
Before starting a shift, a worker fills out a short checklist, noting the critical safety parameters of their workplace. This takes only a couple of minutes but forces the person to consciously focus on key risks. Line managers (foremen) check these checklists using specialized smartphones. This approach ensures control transparency and allows management to see the state of barriers in each area in real time.
The system will not work without the active participation of top management. Leaders must not only approve the list of critical risks but also appoint curators for each of them. Curators are responsible for defining objective parameters for evaluating barriers and monitoring their effectiveness, turning safety management into a measurable business process.
Comments 2
Dmitry Kuptsov,
Thank you for the questions! We've forwarded them to Sergey, he will get back to you with feedback
Dear organizing colleagues, good afternoon!
After yesterday's webinar with Sergey Ryabov, I had additional questions. Could you forward them to expert Sergey Ryabov?
The questions are: 1) What happens when a worker marks one of the "No" options in the checklist? How does the management system respond to such an answer?
2) What happens when a foreman discovers that a worker has filled out a checklist poorly (irresponsibly)? 3) Are there any metrics/KPIs in the company that characterize personnel work with checklists (both workers and foremen)?
Thank you in advance for the answer!
With respect, Kuptsov Dmitry
e-mail: ddkuptcov@severstal.com