Critical Risk Management

Case
11 August 2022 🇷🇺 Original language: русский

The Illusion of Safety: Why Zero Injuries Won't Save You from Disasters

The HSE industry has long relied on minor injury rates (LTIFR) as the primary safety indicator. However, historical examples, such as the Deepwater Horizon platform accident, show that the absence of minor injuries does not guarantee protection against catastrophic events. In his presentation, man-made risk assessment expert Sergey Ryabov explains why the traditional approach needs revision and how the critical risk management methodology helps prevent mass casualties and asset loss.

Prioritization: Not All Violations Are Equally Dangerous

Any company's resources — time, budget, personnel — are always finite. It is impossible to control absolutely all risks simultaneously and with equal efficiency. The speaker emphasizes the need for strict prioritization: the focus should shift to significant negative events. These are situations that, if inadequately controlled, can lead to fatalities, massive environmental damage, or production shutdowns.

Instead of scattering attention on eliminating all minor flaws in a row, the critical risk management system proposes first building reliable protection against fatal threats using a system of barriers.

Technical and Organizational Barriers

Barriers are control elements that stand between the hazard source and a person or asset. The presentation details the division of barriers into two categories:

  • Technical barriers: physical protection systems, such as rotating mechanism guards, earth leakage circuit breakers, or gas control systems. They operate independently of the human factor and prevent the development of an accident.
  • Organizational barriers: permit-to-work systems, regulations for high-risk work, and multi-level control. They set the rules for the safe execution of tasks.

Bottom-Up Implementation: Checklists and Digital Control

One of the main problems with traditional briefings is that workers often do not absorb the information. To translate theory into practice, the speaker demonstrates the implementation of a personal checklist system using a mining enterprise as an example.

Before starting a shift, a worker fills out a short checklist, noting the critical safety parameters of their workplace. This takes only a couple of minutes but forces the person to consciously focus on key risks. Line managers (foremen) check these checklists using specialized smartphones. This approach ensures control transparency and allows management to see the state of barriers in each area in real time.

The Role of Top Management

The system will not work without the active participation of top management. Leaders must not only approve the list of critical risks but also appoint curators for each of them. Curators are responsible for defining objective parameters for evaluating barriers and monitoring their effectiveness, turning safety management into a measurable business process.

What you will learn from this webinar:

  • How to identify critical risks from the enterprise's general hazard register?
  • Why does traditional three-level control often fail, and how can it be modernized?
  • How to implement a checklist system so that it does not turn into a formal brush-off for workers?
  • What parameters should be used to objectively assess the effectiveness of organizational barriers?
  • How to distribute responsibility for critical risk management among top management?
For Pro and VIP members
Structured summary with budget, timelines, team, and tools.
Choose plan

Comments 2

Veronika Shabanova
Veronika Shabanova 3 years ago

Dmitry Kuptsov,
Thank you for the questions! We've forwarded them to Sergey, he will get back to you with feedback

0 0
ДК
Dmitriy Kuptsov 3 years ago

Dear organizing colleagues, good afternoon!
After yesterday's webinar with Sergey Ryabov, I had additional questions. Could you forward them to expert Sergey Ryabov?
The questions are: 1) What happens when a worker marks one of the "No" options in the checklist? How does the management system respond to such an answer?
2) What happens when a foreman discovers that a worker has filled out a checklist poorly (irresponsibly)? 3) Are there any metrics/KPIs in the company that characterize personnel work with checklists (both workers and foremen)?
Thank you in advance for the answer!
With respect, Kuptsov Dmitry
e-mail: ddkuptcov@severstal.com

1 0

600+ cases and practices

Explore the full library of industrial safety best practices

Go to library
We use cookies to improve your experience · Cookie Notice

Join the leaders

14,000+ professionals · 128+ countries

1
Contacts
2
Profile

Registration

Tell us about yourself

Required field
Required field
Enter a valid email
Invalid number

Registration

Professional details

Required field
Required field
Required field

Please consent to newsletters. This will greatly enhance your platform experience.

Registration complete

We sent login credentials to your email. Use the password from the email to sign in.

Didn't receive the email?
Check your Spam folder
Already have an account? Sign In · Forgot password?

Welcome!

You have successfully signed in.

Don't have an account? Register · Forgot password?

Password Recovery

Enter your email to recover access

Enter a valid email

Link sent

A password reset link has been sent to the specified email. The link is valid for 1 hour.

Didn't receive the email?
Check your Spam folder
Remember your password? Sign In · Register