During the investigation of incidents at production facilities, including drilling and well intervention operations, a critical pattern emerges: about 50% of incidents are directly related to a lack of personnel knowledge. This statistic, obtained through internal investigations establishing cause-and-effect relationships, became the starting point for revising approaches to contractor admission to facilities.
Ruslan Mukhamediyarov, Head of Contractor Relations at Gazprom Neft PJSC, analyzes a practical case of creating an effective barrier preventing the admission of unqualified workers. The main task was to implement a knowledge verification system that would be reliable, remote, and would not create unjustified obstacles to production processes.
To solve the problem, an external IT testing platform adapted to the company's specific requirements was chosen. Key characteristics of the implemented system:
The presentation details the process of integrating the testing system into existing business processes. The requirement to pass the assessment was included in contracts and technical specifications with contractors. Testing results are directly integrated into the automated pass issuance system: access to the facility is impossible without reaching the established threshold value.
The approach to setting threshold scores is interesting. At the initial stage, the threshold was set at 30-33% (for example, 3 correct answers out of 10) so as not to paralyze the work of contractors amid a staff shortage. However, the strategy involves an annual increase in this threshold as personnel competencies develop and targeted work is done with identified problem areas (such as working at heights, loading and unloading, and gas-hazardous work).
The speaker pays special attention to the process of creating content for testing. "Knowledge quanta" were developed — blocks of HSE questions tied to specific types of work (excavation, hot work, use of PPE, etc.).
A key success factor was involving not only internal specialists but also representatives of the contracting organizations themselves in the expertise. This made it possible to take into account the specifics of various equipment and technologies used by different contractors and make the knowledge matrices as relevant to real conditions as possible.