🛡️ Safety: Is the "Polished Reports" Disease Curable?

🛡️ Safety: Is the "Polished Reports" Disease Curable?

25 June 2026 🇷🇺 Original: русский 1 min read

Have you ever encountered "polished" reports and presentations on HSE? Sometimes they are so captivating that they resemble the fairy tales of Alexander Pushkin. Why does this genre remain so popular in our professional environment? 🤔

The answer is simple: if such fairy tales are written, it means someone needs them. It is common to think that the CEO or the Board of Directors believes in the effective operation of the HSE system simply due to a lack of data on the real situation. However, this is a misconception.

One should not underestimate the insight of top management. Senior executives have many communication channels, and they always receive exactly the information they need. This means that the "polished reports" disease is born at the very top — where they are "ordered" by the carriers of corporate culture — and only then infects other departments. 😷

The good news is that the solution to the problem lies at that same level.

However, two sensitive questions arise here:
📍Are you, as an HSE professional, ready to take the initiative and honestly discuss the problem with the CEO?

📍Do you have enough courage to risk your career for the sake of the lives and health of people and the well-being of the company you are called to protect?

And who promised that working in HSE would be easy?

There is no "magic pill" here. And even the most advanced AI will not be able to help. 🤖

By the way, AI is just another tool in the extensive HSE arsenal. But has the presence of a hammer or a screwdriver in a toolbox ever meant they were being used correctly? We remember the high-profile accidents of the last 10 – 15 years that occurred despite the most sophisticated, automatic protection systems. Similarly, with AI, people will sooner or later figure out how to bypass it and make it work "correctly." So, one should not rely solely on technology.

Occupational safety is something created and destroyed by people. It is a matter of morality and personal choice. No HSE tools (AI, KPIs, instructions and rules, director's walkabouts, etc.) are capable of fixing a safety culture. The only thing that works is the "ownership approach" of the CEO, their personal example, and their high standards. If people feel that the boss cares, then there is no need to "polish" anything.

Personally, I have been fortunate enough to meet such leaders, work with them, and learn from them. Have you?

P.S. It's all James Reason's fault and his "Taxonomy of Human Error." 😉

💬 Do you recognize the character in the drawing? Does he remind you of anyone?

Colleagues, please share your thoughts in the comments! 👇

Comments 3

Ivan Bobrov
Ivan Bobrov Verified member 3 months ago

What I did not mention in the main text of the blog, but might be useful.


The main secret of success — to speak in the language of top management: in the language of numbers, laws and continuity of business processes:

1. Financial arguments (The language of money)

  • The cost of concealment: the price of a major accident is always higher than the budget for eliminating minor violations.
  • Losses from downtime: evaluate the losses when a workshop or enterprise is stopped due to an emergency for one day.
  • The growth of insurance costs: real incidents raise the cost of property and liability insurance.
  • Investment attractiveness: hidden flaws in the occupational health and safety and industrial safety system can be discovered during an external audit or Due Diligence.

2. Legal security (The language of laws)

  • Subsidiary liability: personal risks of managers in severe accidents (up to criminal liability).

  • The “Paper shield” does not work: examples of judicial practice when formal compliance with legal requirements does not protect against liability.

  • Inspections by government agencies: an honest internal audit allows you to eliminate shortcomings before the arrival of inspectors and fines.

3. Operational efficiency (The language of processes)

  • The iceberg effect: a lot of hidden minor violations tomorrow reduce productivity and can turn into a major incident.

  • Operational discipline: mess in the workplaces, high level of injuries are – direct consequences of a lack of personal responsibility and staff turnover;

  • Reputation: publications in the event of a major incident will surely appear in the media and internet communities.

How to build the conversation itself?

  • Do not criticize failures and the past approach – talk about what has been done well and only then move on to discussing the shortcomings.

  • Bring solutions, not problems – you need a ready-made action plan and an estimate of the required budget.

  • Take away the fear of perfection – failures and mistakes happen to everyone, the main thing is to be able to learn lessons and move forward.

0 0
Liliya Kutergina
Liliya KuterginaVerified member 3 months ago
The topic is very interesting. Thank you.But what is after the article- is super interesting- it is a practical checklist for action. In any case occupational health and safety will develop only with the support of top managers. It is important to study in time what the manager wants: perfect cleanliness, satisfied workers, successful dynamics of indicators..., and lead the conversation from this. Moreover, one can always find an argument for development, what is missing to.... This will be what the director will be interested in (this is either scientific movements, or technologies, or procedures), it is even better to beat around the bush so that the top manager  himself expresses this (your well-thought-out ) idea for implementation. In any case, using the example of other companies one can show either progress or decline.
2 0
Ivan Bobrov
Ivan BobrovVerified member 3 months ago
Lilia, thank you for such a deep and practical comment!
I think you are absolutely right. I am glad that the article prompted you to such precise thoughts.

However, to build successful communication you need to have at least:
1) regular direct access to the decision-maker;
2) high trust on their part or support from managers they respect.

Is the character in the article's picture recognizable? Did you manage to recognize him?
0 0

Expert Blog

Read articles by safety leaders

All blog articles
We use cookies to improve your experience · Cookie Notice

Join the leaders

14,000+ professionals · 128+ countries

1
Contacts
2
Profile

Registration

Tell us about yourself

Required field
Required field
Enter a valid email
Invalid number

Registration

Professional details

Required field
Required field
Required field

Please consent to newsletters. This will greatly enhance your platform experience.

Registration complete

We sent login credentials to your email. Use the password from the email to sign in.

Didn't receive the email?
Check your Spam folder
Already have an account? Sign In · Forgot password?

Welcome!

You have successfully signed in.

Don't have an account? Register · Forgot password?

Password Recovery

Enter your email to recover access

Enter a valid email

Link sent

A password reset link has been sent to the specified email. The link is valid for 1 hour.

Didn't receive the email?
Check your Spam folder
Remember your password? Sign In · Register