The modern approach to occupational safety has long moved beyond specialized departments. Safety is the working style of the entire enterprise, which directly depends on the position of top management. In her presentation, Tatiana Bobrovitskaya, a representative of Shell, examines the evolution of corporate safety culture: from the implementation of the Hearts and Minds program in the early 2000s, which shifted the focus from technical instructions to people's conscious attitudes, to the modern concepts of Human Performance and Learner Mindset.
The speaker emphasizes an important paradigm shift: mistakes are inevitable because they are made by living people. The main task of a modern safety system is to create conditions where a mistake will not lead to fatal consequences. For this, the psychological safety of the environment is critically important. If employees fear punishment, they hide incidents and potentially dangerous situations, depriving the company of the opportunity to learn lessons and prevent future accidents.
The role of a leader is especially relevant for Russian enterprises with their pronounced hierarchical structure. Top management not only sets the tone and allocates resources but also performs a crucial integration function. The speaker notes that incidents often occur at the intersection of different departments' areas of responsibility. It is the leader who can overcome this fragmentation by building effective interaction between departments and making safety a shared task, rather than solely the problem of a specialized service.
The presentation details specific behavioral patterns that a manager must demonstrate to build a reliable safety culture:
A separate section of the presentation is devoted to the specifics of working in joint ventures, where the interests and corporate cultures of different shareholders collide. Using the example of Shell's partnerships in Russia, the speaker shows how a dialogue is built to align safety standards. The most important stage of this work begins even before contracts are signed: the company conducts a deep assessment of the HSE risks of a potential asset. The presence of insurmountable restrictions (for example, working in national parks) can cause a deal to be rejected, while in other cases, requirements to bring the asset up to corporate safety standards are embedded directly into the structure of the agreement.